Pro-XRP Attorney Explains What Could Have Helped Ripple in its Battle Against SEC

In this article, an attorney specializing in XRP (Ripple) sheds light on what could have assisted Ripple in its legal dispute with the SEC. The attorney provides valuable insights into strategies or actions that Ripple could have taken to strengthen its case and potentially overcome the SEC’s allegations. This informative analysis offers valuable information for individuals interested in the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the SEC.

Title 1: John Deaton Urges SEC to Allow Testimony of Former Executives in Ripple Lawsuit

Title 2: Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Faces “Aiding and Abetting” Allegations: John Deaton Responds

John Deaton, the founder of CryptolawUS and a strong advocate for XRP holders, has expressed his disagreement with the SEC’s allegations of “aiding and abetting” against Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple. According to Deaton, this situation could have been avoided if the SEC had allowed previous executives Bill Hinman and Jay Clayton to testify earlier in the litigation process.

In the Ripple v. SEC lawsuit, Digital Asset Investor, another prominent figure in the crypto community, stated that he would have called Jay Clayton, Bill Hinman, Lowell Ness (a16z attorney), and Chris Dixon as the first witnesses in the trial. Jay Clayton, who reportedly assigned executives to oversee the Ethereum Free Pass Speech, played a significant role in the case.

Deaton emphasizes that Bill Hinman’s appearance as a witness in court is essential. He also points out that there was no opportunity to call a former SEC Chairman to testify. Although he believes that charging Brad Garlinghouse was a mistake on the part of the SEC, Deaton highlights Jay Clayton as a crucial witness who should provide testimony in court. Clayton had the intention of bringing a “non-fraud” case against Ripple executives on an individual basis.

It is worth noting that Garlinghouse expressed his frustrations to Clayton after the Hinman lecture, stating that Ripple was “living in purgatory.” However, Clayton and Hinman did not confirm whether XRP was considered a security or not. Deaton argues that if Clayton and Hinman had clarified their stance sooner, it could have saved valuable time, money, and resources spent on litigation and proceedings. Instead, those resources could have been better used to promote the adoption and use of cryptocurrencies. Despite Judge Torres’ ruling that XRP is not a security, the SEC is still fighting to overturn this decision.

In conclusion, John Deaton believes that the SEC’s allegations against Brad Garlinghouse could have been avoided if former executives Bill Hinman and Jay Clayton had testified earlier. Their clarifications on the status of XRP as a security could have potentially saved time and resources. The Ripple v. SEC lawsuit continues, and the crypto community awaits the outcome of this highly anticipated case.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or investment advice.

Leave a Comment

Google News